American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 11, Issue 5 847-849, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Optimization of low-osmolality contrast media for cranial CT: a dose comparison of two contrast agents
MJ Kuhn and MR Baker
Department of Radiology, St. John's Hospital, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62769.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative study of 200 patients was made to examine the image quality, safety, and costs of 100 ml of ioversol-320 (32 g iodine) and 150 ml of iohexol-300 (45 g iodine) in patients undergoing cranial CT. We found no statistically significant difference in image quality between the two low-osmolality, nonionic contrast agents at these doses. There was a statistically significant (p = .02) difference in the occurrence of minor to mild adverse effects caused by ioversol (n = 0) as compared with iohexol (n = 5). No patient in either group experienced any major contrast-induced reactions. Contrast media costs were 34% less in patients receiving 32 g of iodine as compared with those receiving 45 g of iodine. This study demonstrates that high-quality cranial CT scans are possible even with a reduced volume of low-osmolality contrast medium, and that the potential cost savings are significant.