American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 12, Issue 1 149-154, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients
AW Litt, EM Eidelman, RS Pinto, TS Riles, SJ McLachlan, S Schwartzenberg, JC Weinreb and II Kricheff
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.
Fifty patients underwent 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography and intraarterial contrast angiography for evaluation of possible carotid atherosclerotic disease. The MR angiography technique employed contiguous axial flow-sensitive (short TR/TE) slices that were reformatted and postprocessed by using a maximum-intensity projection algorithm to provide 16 angiographic views of the carotid arteries. Both studies were independently reviewed by two observers in a blinded manner. Carotid arteries were categorized as normal, mildly stenotic, moderately stenotic, severely stenotic, or occluded. For the 94 carotid arteries available for review, one observer reported a 70% agreement between the two techniques and the second observer reported a 56% agreement (p = .0001). The best correlation was in the severely stenotic category and the worst was in the occluded category. Agreement between observers was 67% for MR angiography and 72% for contrast angiography, which was similar to that between the two techniques. Although not all carotid atherosclerotic disease was visualized equally well, 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography had a good overall correlation with the "gold standard" of intraarterial contrast angiography, supporting its use as a screening technique. While further improvements are needed, use of MR angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for many patients with suspected carotid stenosis should continue to increase.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. F. Layton, J. Huston 3rd, H. J. Cloft, T. J. Kaufmann, K. N. Krecke, and D. F. Kallmes Specificity of MR Angiography as a Confirmatory Test for Carotid Artery Stenosis: Is It Valid? Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1114 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Groves, W. Bireley, K. Dill, T. J. Carroll, and J. C. Carr Quantitative Analysis of ECG-Gated High-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 522 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, G. DeVeber, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong Angiography of Primary Central Nervous System Angiitis of Childhood: Conventional Angiography versus Magnetic Resonance Angiography at Presentation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, G. DeVeber, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong MR Imaging and Angiography of Primary CNS Vasculitis of Childhood AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 192 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K J Ahn, W J You, J H Lee, B J Kang, Y J Kim, B S Kim, and S T Hahn Re-circulation artefact at the carotid bulb can be differentiated from true stenosis Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 77(919): 551 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cosottini, A. Pingitore, M. Puglioli, M. C. Michelassi, G. Lupi, A. Abbruzzese, R. Calabrese, M. Lombardi, G. Parenti, and C. Bartolozzi Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E Westwood, S. Kelly, E. Berry, J. M Bamford, M. J Gough, C M. Airey, J. F M Meaney, L. M Davies, J. Cullingworth, and M. A Smith Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review BMJ, January 26, 2002; 324(7331): 198 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Nagano, K. Maruoka, S. Uemura, and M. Takahashi Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Grossman BRAIN IMAGING AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 9 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Sempere, J. Duarte, C. Cabezas, and L. E. Claveria Etiopathogenesis of Transient Ischemic Attacks and Minor Ischemic Strokes : A Community-Based Study in Segovia, Spain Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 40 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Culebras, C. S. Kase, J. C. Masdeu, A. J. Fox, R. N. Bryan, C. B. Grossman, D. H. Lee, H. P. Adams, W. Thies, and E. O. Members Practice Guidelines for the Use of Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attacks and Acute Stroke : A Report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1480 - 1497. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Patel, K. M. Kuntz, R. A. Klufas, D. Kim, J. Kramer, J. F. Polak, J. J. Skillman, A. D. Whittemore, R. R. Edelman, and K. C. Kent Preoperative Assessment of the Carotid Bifurcation : Can Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Ultrasonography Replace Contrast Arteriography? Stroke, October 1, 1995; 26(10): 1753 - 1758. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Stary, A. B. Chandler, R. E. Dinsmore, V. Fuster, S. Glagov, W. Insull Jr, M. E. Rosenfeld, C. J. Schwartz, W. D. Wagner, and R. W. Wissler A Definition of Advanced Types of Atherosclerotic Lesions and a Histological Classification of Atherosclerosis : A Report From the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 1995; 15(9): 1512 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Stary, A. B. Chandler, R. E. Dinsmore, V. Fuster, S. Glagov, W. Insull Jr, M. E. Rosenfeld, C. J. Schwartz, W. D. Wagner, and R. W. Wissler A Definition of Advanced Types of Atherosclerotic Lesions and a Histological Classification of Atherosclerosis : A Report From the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1355 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Manning, W. Li, and R. R. Edelman A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional Angiography N. Engl. J. Med., March 25, 1993; 328(12): 828 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||







