American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 12, Issue 3 529-532, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
High-intensity signals within the posterior pituitary fossa: a study with fat-suppression MR techniques
LP Mark, VM Haughton, LE Hendrix, DL Daniels, AL Williams, LF Czervionke and RJ Asleson
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
Five different theories have been proposed to explain the high- intensity signals within the posterior pituitary fossa seen on MR: (1) a paramagnetic effect of phospholipids in the posterior lobe, (2) lipid in pituicytes in the posterior lobe of the pituitary, (3) neurosecretory granules in the posterior lobe, (4) fat within the sella but outside the pituitary gland, and (5) fat in bone marrow in the dorsum sellae. Previous reports have contained conflicting evidence on which of these structures is the cause of the high-intensity signals within the posterior sella. The purpose of this study was to examine the high-intensity signals of the normal posterior sella with fat- suppression MR techniques to reevaluate the contribution of fat to those signals. The sellae of 19 normal volunteers and two cadavers were imaged with MR with a commercially available unit and a research fat- water-suppression technique. High-intensity signals in the posterior sella were observed in all 21 subjects on conventional T1-weighted MR images. In two volunteers, the high-intensity signals in the posterior sella were suppressed with fat-suppression techniques; in 17 subjects the signals were suppressed with water-suppression techniques. In two volunteers the results were indeterminate. The high-intensity signals in the posterior sella do not behave like lipid in the majority of cases. Our study supports the conclusion that high-intensity signals in the posterior sella may have more than one source. It appears that most of these sources do not suppress with fat-suppression techniques.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. A. Mitchell, P. Q. Thomas, M. R. Zacharin, and I. E. Scheffer Ectopic Posterior Pituitary Lobe and Periventricular Heterotopia: Cerebral Malformations with the Same Underlying Mechanism? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1475 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Bonneville, Y. Narboux, F. Cattin, E. Rodiere, G. Jacquet, and J.-F. Bonneville Preoperative Location of the Pituitary Bright Spot in Patients with Pituitary Macroadenomas AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 528 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. P. Mahoney, E. Weinberger, C. Bryant, M. Ito, J. L. Jameson, and M. Ito Effects of Aging on Vasopressin Production in a Kindred with Autosomal Dominant Neurohypophyseal Diabetes Insipidus Due to the {Delta}E47 Neurophysin Mutation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 870 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. I. Grossman BRAIN IMAGING AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 9 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Gagliardi, S. Bernasconi, and D. R. Repaske Autosomal Dominant Neurohypophyseal Diabetes Insipidus Associated with a Missense Mutation Encoding Gly23->Val in Neurophysin II J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1997; 82(11): 3643 - 3646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|