AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogels, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Horstink, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogels, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Horstink, M. W.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 7 1441-1445, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

MR volume estimation of subcortical brain lesions and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid: a simple and accurate stereologic method

OJ Vogels, JC Zijlmans, MA van't Hof, HO Thijssen and MW Horstink
Institute of Neurology, Academic Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To describe an MR imaging quantification method for estimation of total volumes of both white and gray matter subcortical lesions and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the living human brain, and to determine the method's reliability. METHODS: In 12 subjects, total subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF volumes were estimated using systematic sampling. Systematic sampling was performed on equidistant MR sections using a counting grid with systematically ordered intersection points. The grid was randomly positioned on each consecutive MR section. Each grid intersection point hitting the structure of interest represents a fixed known volume dependent on grid intersection point distance and the sum of the section thickness and section gap. RESULTS: Total volume estimation of subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF takes 15 and 5 minutes per subject, respectively. Coefficients of error of the individual volume estimates ranged from .01 to .13 and are negligible to the coefficients of the group mean (range, .70 to .89). For subcortical lesion volume, the random intraobserver error yielded .04 and for ventricular CSF .02; the random interobserver error amounted to .11 and .04, respectively; and the systematic interobserver error was .15 and .04, respectively. CONCLUSION: The method described here for subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF volume estimation is accurate, reliable, valid, and fast.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Hayashi, T. Masumoto, T. Okubo, O. Abe, N. Kaji, K. Tokioka, S. Aoki, and K. Ohtomo
Hemangiomas in the Face and Extremities: MR-guided Sclerotherapy--Optimization with Monitoring of Signal Intensity Changes in Vivo
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 567 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P. E VOS, O. J M VOGELS, T. BEEMS, H. O M THIJSSEN, C. ZIMMERMAN;, N. STOCCHETTI, and A. COLOMBO
Mass volume measurement in severe head injury
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2000; 69(3): 406a - 407.
[Full Text]