American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 9 1875-1883, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Imaging of carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy and cost- effectiveness
R Vanninen, H Manninen and S Soimakallio
Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
PURPOSE: To determine the most accurate, safe, and cost-effective imaging protocol for selecting patients for carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: The actual costs of carotid angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy with different confidence levels was assessed for carotid ultrasound and MR angiography in 45 patients. The cost-effectiveness and theoretical impact on patient outcome of hypothetical screening models were compared. RESULTS: Ultrasound before angiography is more effective and considerably cheaper than performing angiography in all patients presenting with transient ischemic attacks ($25 216 versus $48 708 imaging costs per one prevented stroke). When the more costly MR angiography was used to select patients for angiography the slightly higher diagnostic accuracy did not result in a greater number of prevented strokes. As the only preoperative scrutiny, the combination of ultrasound and MR angiography would have resulted in a greater number of prevented strokes than invasive angiography (27.9 versus 23.3) but at the expense of unnecessary surgery (6.6% of all surgeries). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound followed by confirmatory angiography is a cost-effective way to image patients suspected of carotid artery stenosis. MR angiography may become cost effective and lead to a better final patient outcome only when it can reliably replace invasive angiography as the preoperative examination.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S. Medina, E. Aguirre, B. Bernal, and N. R. Altman Functional MR Imaging versus Wada Test for Evaluation of Language Lateralization: Cost Analysis Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 49 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Benade and C. P. Warlow Cost of Identifying Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 435 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Benade and C. P. Warlow Costs and Benefits of Carotid Endarterectomy and Associated Preoperative Arterial Imaging: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Literature Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 629 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Rubin, M. D. Armerding, M. D. Dake, and S. Napel Cost Identification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Imaging by Using Time and Motion Analyses Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 63 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ronkainen, H. Miettinen, K. Karkola, S. Papinaho, R. Vanninen, M. Puranen, and J. Hernesniemi Risk of Harboring an Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Stroke, February 1, 1998; 29(2): 359 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Obuchowski, M. T. Modic, M. Magdinec, and T. J. Masaryk Assessment of the Efficacy of Noninvasive Screening for Patients With Asymptomatic Neck Bruits Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1330 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||


