AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, J. H.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 1 143-150, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

MR characteristics of histopathologic subtypes of spinal ependymoma

H Kahan, EM Sklar, MJ Post and JH Bruce
Department of Radiology, University of Miami (Fla), School of Medicine 33136, USA.

PURPOSE: To examine MR characteristics and enhancement patterns of spinal ependymomas and compare these data with histopathologic subtypes. METHODS: The MR images from 26 cases of pathologically proved spinal ependymomas were evaluated with respect to seven criteria: signal characteristics, enhancement pattern, length of involvement, cysts or syrinxes, hemorrhage, bony changes, and type of cord expansion. Signal characteristics were then correlated with histologic subtype. RESULTS: In the category of enhancement pattern, our results differed markedly from published data, with only 38% of cases demonstrating classic homogeneous enhancement. The remainder of our cases (62%) demonstrated other enhancement patterns, including heterogeneous (31%), rim (19%), minimal (6%), and no enhancement (6%). Pathologic comparison revealed that one histologic subtype, the myxopapillary ependymoma, demonstrated unique imaging characteristics on T1-weighted images. A highly statistically significant percentage of this variant was hyperintense on T1, whereas most nonmyxopapillary ependymomas were hypointense. CONCLUSION: The radiologist should be aware of alternative patterns of enhancement of spinal ependymomas and not be dissuaded from the diagnosis in appropriate clinical settings. In addition, one histologic subtype, myxopapillary, often exhibits signal characteristics different from nonmyxopapillary types, appearing hyperintense on T1 probably because of their intracellular and perivascular accumulation of mucin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. M. Shors, T. A. Jones, M. D. Jhaveri, and M. S. Huckman
Best Cases from the AFIP: Myxopapillary Ependymoma of the Sacrum
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S111 - S116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. K. Koeller, R. S. Rosenblum, and A. L. Morrison
Neoplasms of the Spinal Cord and Filum Terminale: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2000; 20(6): 1721 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]