AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chee, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chee, H.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 1 29-34, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

In vitro evaluation of coils for endovascular therapy

MP Marks, C Tsai and H Chee
Department of Radiology, Stanford (Calif) University Medical Center, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the physical characteristics and behavior of coils for endovascular therapy. METHODS: Mechanically detachable coils were constructed with simple helical (4 mm X 10 cm and 8 mm X 30 cm) and pretzel shapes (4 mm X 5 cm) made from three metals using 0.003- and 0.004-in wire. Stiffness or pliability, frictional resistance, shape memory, and coil stability were evaluated in vitro. RESULTS: The 0.004- in wire stock coils proved significantly stiffer when compared with the 0.003-in coils. Tungsten coils proved least pliable; platinum coils were intermediate in stiffness; and nitinol coils were softest. Frictional resistance in the catheter was greatest for stiffer coils. The 5-cm pretzel coil consistently created more frictional force than the 10- or 30-cm simple helical coils. Despite a shorter length, the 4- mm simple helical coil exerted more frictional force than the 8-mm coil. Stiffer metal coils constructed of larger-diameter wire (0.004 in) were more stable than softer coils. CONCLUSION: Stiffer coils exert greater frictional forces within the catheter and a greater resistive force during bending but are more stable after placement. Frictional forces also depend on the complex three-dimensional shape of the coil and the diameter of the turns in that shape rather than coil length. These data suggest that a family of coils of different metals is optimal for varied intravascular needs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P.E. Schloesser, R.S. Pakbaz, D.I. Levy, S.G. Imbesi, W.H. Wong, and C.W. Kerber
Analysis of Complex Framing Coil Stability in a Wide-Necked Aneurysm Model
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2007; 28(2): 387 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. P. Ng, V. V. Halbach, L. P. Caragine, C. F. Dowd, and R. T. Higashida
Guglielmi Detachable Coil Extraction: Suction Generated by Pusher-Wire Withdrawal after Coil Detachment within an Intracranial Aneurysm
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 982 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Abruzzo, H. J. Cloft, M. Marek, G. G. Shengelaia, P. B. Snowhill, S. M. Waldrop, and A. Sambanis
Interaction of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells with Collagen-Impregnated Embolization Coils Studied with a Novel Quantitative in Vitro Model
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 674 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]