AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norbash, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norbash, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. P.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 1 41-49, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration

AM Norbash, D Busick and MP Marks
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305, USA.

PURPOSE: To limit the side effects of interventional neuroradiologic radiation, such as epilation, by applying a technique involving tube position rotation and by adding a supplemental inexpensive primary beam filter; and to show the dose effect of modifying technical factors. METHODS: Combined skin dose from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography was measured with an array of 16 thermoluminescent dosimeters during interventional neuroradiologic procedures in 12 control subjects, in 18 patients whose procedures included addition of an inexpensive primary beam filter (0.5 mm aluminum/0.076 mm copper), and in 10 patients in whom the tube position was rotated, additional primary beam filtration was used, and close attention was paid to technique. RESULTS: Maximum thermoluminescent dosimetric measurements obtained with existing machine filtration ranged from 0.31 to 2.70 Gy in the control group (mean, 1.51 +/- 0.88); 0.25 to 2.42 Gy in the group with additional filtration alone (mean 0.96 + 0.64; average dose reduction, 36%); and 0.13 to 1.23 Gy in the group with additional filtration, tube position rotation, and close attention to technique (mean, 0.58 +/- 0.34; average dose reduction, 63%). Differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 50% skin dose reductions were documented during interventional neuroradiologic procedures by combining tube position rotation, supplemental primary beam filtration, and technical modifications.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Moritake, Y. Matsumaru, T. Takigawa, K. Nishizawa, A. Matsumura, and K. Tsuboi
Dose Measurement on Both Patients and Operators during Neurointerventional Procedures Using Photoluminescence Glass Dosimeters
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1910 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, Y. Matsumaru, S. Nobuyuki, M. Ebara, T. Abe, and D. Itoh
Patient Skin Dose during Neuroembolization by Multiple-Point Measurement Using a Radiosensitive Indicator
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1076 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Hatakeyama, S. Kakeda, N. Ohnari, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto, and Y. Korogi
Reduction of Radiation Dose for Cerebral Angiography Using Flat Panel Detector of Direct Conversion Type: A Vascular Phantom Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. D'Ercole, L. Mantovani, F. Z. Thyrion, M. Bocchiola, A. Azzaretti, F. Di Maria, C. M. Saluzzo, P. Quaretti, G. Rodolico, P. Scagnelli, et al.
A Study on Maximum Skin Dose in Cerebral Embolization Procedures
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 503 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. Bor, S. Cekirge, T. Turkay, O. Turan, M. Gulay, E. Onal, and B. Cil
Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Persliden
Patient and staff doses in interventional X-ray procedures in Sweden
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 150 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Bor, T Sancak, T Olgar, Y Elcim, A Adanali, U Sanlidilek, and S Akyar
Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C Theodorakou and J A Horrocks
A study on radiation doses and irradiated areas in cerebral embolisation
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2003; 76(908): 546 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. A. Given, I. C. Thacker, M. D. Baker, and P. P. Morris
Fluoroscopy Fade for Embolization of Vein of Galen Malformation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 267 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. L. Miller, S. Balter, P. T. Noonan, and J. D. Georgia
Minimizing Radiation-induced Skin Injury in Interventional Radiology Procedures
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. Koenig, F. A. Mettler, and L. K. Wagner
Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 Cases and Recommendations for Minimizing Dose Delivered to Patient
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 13 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Cooperative Study between the ASNR ASITN, and the
Quality Improvement Guidelines for Adult Diagnostic Neuroangiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 146 - 150.
[Full Text] [PDF]