American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 1 41-49, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration
AM Norbash, D Busick and MP Marks
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305, USA.
PURPOSE: To limit the side effects of interventional neuroradiologic radiation, such as epilation, by applying a technique involving tube position rotation and by adding a supplemental inexpensive primary beam filter; and to show the dose effect of modifying technical factors. METHODS: Combined skin dose from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography was measured with an array of 16 thermoluminescent dosimeters during interventional neuroradiologic procedures in 12 control subjects, in 18 patients whose procedures included addition of an inexpensive primary beam filter (0.5 mm aluminum/0.076 mm copper), and in 10 patients in whom the tube position was rotated, additional primary beam filtration was used, and close attention was paid to technique. RESULTS: Maximum thermoluminescent dosimetric measurements obtained with existing machine filtration ranged from 0.31 to 2.70 Gy in the control group (mean, 1.51 +/- 0.88); 0.25 to 2.42 Gy in the group with additional filtration alone (mean 0.96 + 0.64; average dose reduction, 36%); and 0.13 to 1.23 Gy in the group with additional filtration, tube position rotation, and close attention to technique (mean, 0.58 +/- 0.34; average dose reduction, 63%). Differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 50% skin dose reductions were documented during interventional neuroradiologic procedures by combining tube position rotation, supplemental primary beam filtration, and technical modifications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Moritake, Y. Matsumaru, T. Takigawa, K. Nishizawa, A. Matsumura, and K. Tsuboi Dose Measurement on Both Patients and Operators during Neurointerventional Procedures Using Photoluminescence Glass Dosimeters AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1910 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, Y. Matsumaru, S. Nobuyuki, M. Ebara, T. Abe, and D. Itoh Patient Skin Dose during Neuroembolization by Multiple-Point Measurement Using a Radiosensitive Indicator AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1076 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Martin RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hatakeyama, S. Kakeda, N. Ohnari, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto, and Y. Korogi Reduction of Radiation Dose for Cerebral Angiography Using Flat Panel Detector of Direct Conversion Type: A Vascular Phantom Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 645 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D'Ercole, L. Mantovani, F. Z. Thyrion, M. Bocchiola, A. Azzaretti, F. Di Maria, C. M. Saluzzo, P. Quaretti, G. Rodolico, P. Scagnelli, et al. A Study on Maximum Skin Dose in Cerebral Embolization Procedures AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 503 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bor, S. Cekirge, T. Turkay, O. Turan, M. Gulay, E. Onal, and B. Cil Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Persliden Patient and staff doses in interventional X-ray procedures in Sweden Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 150 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Bor, T Sancak, T Olgar, Y Elcim, A Adanali, U Sanlidilek, and S Akyar Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 315 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Theodorakou and J A Horrocks A study on radiation doses and irradiated areas in cerebral embolisation Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2003; 76(908): 546 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Given, I. C. Thacker, M. D. Baker, and P. P. Morris Fluoroscopy Fade for Embolization of Vein of Galen Malformation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 267 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Miller, S. Balter, P. T. Noonan, and J. D. Georgia Minimizing Radiation-induced Skin Injury in Interventional Radiology Procedures Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 329 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Koenig, F. A. Mettler, and L. K. Wagner Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 Cases and Recommendations for Minimizing Dose Delivered to Patient Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 13 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Cooperative Study between the ASNR ASITN, and the Quality Improvement Guidelines for Adult Diagnostic Neuroangiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 146 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




