AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kanal, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kanal, E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 7 1211-1218, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

T2-weighted MR characteristics of internal auditory canal masses

MB Fukui, JL Weissman, HD Curtin and E Kanal
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether masses of the internal auditory canal are hypointense relative to cerebrospinal fluid, and therefore visible, on fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR images. METHODS: Forty-six patients had 50 masses of the internal auditory canal, identified initially on contrast-enhanced MR images, that were evaluated retrospectively for signal intensity of the mass with respect to cerebrospinal fluid and for visibility of the neural elements within the internal auditory canal on T2-weighted images. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 50 masses were clearly identified on T2-weighted images. Three small abnormalities (2 to 4 mm) were not seen with confidence on T2-weighted images. However, on close inspection of these three masses, the small abnormality on contrast-enhanced MR images corresponded to a hypointense focus on T2- weighted images. All 50 masses were hypointense relative to cerebrospinal fluid on T2-weighted images. CONCLUSION: All masses of the internal auditory canal in this study were hypointense relative to cerebrospinal fluid on T-2 weighted images, and were therefore visible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F. Dubrulle, J. Delomez, A. Kiaei, P. Berger, C. Vincent, F.-M. M. Vaneecloo, and L. Lemaitre
Mass Screening for Retrocochlear Disorders: Low-Field-Strength (0.2-T) versus High-Field-Strength (1.5-T) MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 918 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. L. Salzman, H. C. Davidson, H. R. Harnsberger, C. M. Glastonbury, R. H. Wiggins, S. Ellul, and C. Shelton
Dumbbell Schwannomas of the Internal Auditory Canal
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2001; 22(7): 1368 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. S. Robinette, C. D. Bauch, W. O. Olsen, and M. J. Cevette
Auditory Brainstem Response and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Acoustic Neuromas: Costs by Prevalence
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2000; 126(8): 963 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. L. Weissman and B. E. Hirsch
Imaging of Tinnitus: A Review
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 342 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. Schmalbrock, D. W. Chakeres, J. W. Monroe, A. Saraswat, B. A. Miles, and D. B. Welling
Assessment of Internal Auditory Canal Tumors: A Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted and Steady-State T2-Weighted Gradient-Echo MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 1999; 20(7): 1207 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Iwayama, Naganawa, Ito, Fukatsu, Ikeda, Ishigaki, and Ichinose
High-Resolution MR Cisternography of the Cerebellopontine Angle: 2D versus 3D Fast Spin-Echo
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 889 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text]