AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kendall, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kendall, B. E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 2, Issue 5 453-460, Copyright © 1981 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

CT of the adverse effects of therapeutic radiation of the central nervous system

DP Kingsley and BE Kendall

Clinical deterioration during or after radiation of the central nervous system may be due to progression of, or a complication induced in, the lesion being treated. Deterioration may also be due to an adverse effect of the radiation on nervous tissue or vessels within the beam, to alteration in the blood-brain barrier, thus influencing the effects of drug therapy, or to a superimposed catastrophe unrelated to the treatment. Transient effects, which occur within the first 3 months of radiotherapy, include increase in symptoms suggesting enlargement of the tumor and the somnolence syndrome that occurs in children. Classical permanent radiation effects include necrosis, atrophy, calcification, necrotizing leukoencephalopathy, mineralizing microangiopathy, aneurysm formation, tumor induction, and cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. Rarely, demyelination occurs with higher doses than are currently used. The permanent effects tend to occur later than the transient ones; some are progressive and many have serious consequences. The appearances of mineralizing microangiopathy are specific; but the nature of the other complications is only evident in the clinical context, although there may be difficulty distinguishing between radiation necrosis and further growth of an intracerebral tumor. Selected cases illustrate the computed tomographic features of these entities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Kumar, N. E. Leeds, G. N. Fuller, P. Van Tassel, M. H. Maor, R. E. Sawaya, and V. A. Levin
Malignant Gliomas: MR Imaging Spectrum of Radiation Therapy- and Chemotherapy-induced Necrosis of the Brain after Treatment
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. E. Ricci, A. Pitt, P. J. Keller, S. W. Coons, and J. E. Heiserman
Effect of Voxel Position on Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2000; 21(2): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C M Sue, D S Crimmins, Y S Soo, R Pamphlett, C M Presgrave, N Kotsimbos, M J B Jean-Francois, E Byrne, and J G L Morris
Neuroradiological features of six kindreds with MELAS tRNALeu A3243G point mutation: implications for pathogenesis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 1998; 65(2): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text]