AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Radue, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Radue, E. W.

ARTICLE

Cerebral Veins: Comparative Study of CT Venography with Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography

Stephan G. Wetzel,a, Eberhard Kirscha, Klaus W. Stocka, Michael Kolbea, Achim Kaima and Ernst W. Raduea

a From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Basel, Kantonsspital, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare the reliability of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in imaging cerebral venous anatomy and pathology.

METHODS: In 25 consecutive patients, 426 venous structures were determined as present, partially present, or absent by three observers evaluating CT multiplanar reformatted (MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. These results were compared with the results from intraarterial DSA and, in a second step, with the results of an intraobserver consensus. In addition, pathologic conditions were described.

RESULTS: Using DSA as the standard of reference, MPR images had an overall sensitivity of 95% (specificity, 19%) and MIP images a sensitivity of 80% (specificity, 44%) in depicting the cerebral venous anatomy. On the basis of an intraobserver consensus including DSA, MPR, and MIP images (415 vessels present), the sensitivity/specificity was 95%/91% for MPR, 90%/100% for DSA, and 79%/91% for MIP images. MPR images were superior to DSA images in showing the cavernous sinus, the inferior sagittal sinus, and the basal vein of Rosenthal. Venous occlusive diseases were correctly recognized on both MPR and MIP images. Only DSA images provided reliable information of invasion of a sinus by an adjacent meningioma.

CONCLUSION: CT venography proved to be a reliable method to depict the cerebral venous structures. MPR images were superior to MIP images.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. S. Poon, J.-K. Chang, A. Swarnkar, M. H. Johnson, and J. Wasenko
Radiologic Diagnosis of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Pictorial Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6_Supplement): S64 - S75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
E TEASDALE
Mutlidetector CT: new horizons in neurological imaging
Imaging, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 153 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Linn, B. Ertl-Wagner, K.C. Seelos, M. Strupp, M. Reiser, H. Bruckmann, and R. Bruning
Diagnostic Value of Multidetector-Row CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Thrombosis of the Cerebral Venous Sinuses
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 946 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R Smith and M D Hourihan
Investigating suspected cerebral venous thrombosis
BMJ, April 14, 2007; 334(7597): 794 - 795.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Khandelwal, A. Agarwal, R. Kochhar, J. R. Bapuraj, P. Singh, S. Prabhakar, and S. Suri
Comparison of CT Venography with MR Venography in Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1637 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. Widjaja, M. Shroff, S. Blaser, S. Laughlin, and C. Raybaud
2D Time-of-Flight MR Venography in Neonates: Anatomy and Pitfalls.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1913 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. H. Rodallec, A. Krainik, A. Feydy, A. Helias, J.-M. Colombani, M.-C. Julles, V. Marteau, and M. Zins
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Multidetector CT Angiography: Tips and Tricks
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S5 - S18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. L. Leach, R. B. Fortuna, B. V. Jones, and M. F. Gaskill-Shipley
Imaging of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Current Techniques, Spectrum of Findings, and Diagnostic Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S19 - S41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Takhtani
CT Neuroangiography: A Glance at the Common Pitfalls and Their Prevention
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 772 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
I. C. van der Schaaf, B. K. Velthuis, A. Gouw, and G. J. E. Rinkel
Venous Drainage in Perimesencephalic Hemorrhage
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1614 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. B. L. M. Majoie, M. van Straten, H. W. Venema, and G. J. den Heeten
Multisection CT Venography of the Dural Sinuses and Cerebral Veins by Using Matched Mask Bone Elimination
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 787 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Stolz, S. Trittmacher, A. Rahimi, T. Gerriets, C. Rottger, R. Siekmann, and M. Kaps
Influence of Recanalization on Outcome in Dural Sinus Thrombosis: A Prospective Study
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 544 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Suzuki, H. Ikeda, M. Shimadu, Y. Ikeda, and K. Matsumoto
Variations of the Basal Vein: Identification Using Three-dimensional CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2001; 22(4): 670 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text]