AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Eskridge, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Eskridge, J. M.

ARTICLE

Embolization of Meningohypophyseal and Inferolateral Branches of the Cavernous Internal Carotid Artery

David H. Robinsona, Joon K. Songa and Joseph M. Eskridge,a

a From the Departments of Radiology (D.H.R., J.K.S., J.M.E.) and Neurosurgery (J.M.E.), University of Washington, Seattle.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the continued improvements in endovascular techniques this decade, few dedicated studies addressing the feasibility of such procedures or their efficacy relative to risk have been conducted. The purpose of this study was to use current endovascular techniques to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of direct selective catheterization and embolization of the small branches of the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the findings in 10 patients with lesions (five meningiomas and five arteriovenous malformations) primarily or partly supplied by branches of the meningohypophyseal trunk or inferolateral trunk who had undergone endovascular embolization of the feeding arteries during the period from 1991 to 1997. In each case, the artery was selectively catheterized with a microcatheter/microguidewire system and embolized with polyvinyl alcohol particles (n = 5), n-butyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (n = 4), or both (n = 1).

RESULTS: In all 10 patients, the feeding artery from the meningohypophyseal trunk (eight patients) or inferolateral trunk (three patients; one patient with both) was successfully catheterized and embolized. In nine patients, embolization resulted in complete obliteration of the vascular territory; in the remaining patient, blood supply was decreased by an estimated 80%. No immediate or delayed complications occurred.

CONCLUSION: Advances in microcatheter and microguidewire technology allow more efficient and safer selective catheterization and embolization of branches of the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery than in the recent past. Meticulous technique and detailed knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the cavernous sinus region are necessary to maximize lesion devascularization and to minimize the risk of stroke, cranial nerve palsies, and blindness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
N. M. Borden and K. M. Liebman
Endovascular Access to the Meningohypophyseal Trunk
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2001; 22(4): 725 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text]