Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaloupka, J. C. Articles by Sasaki, C. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chaloupka, J. C. Articles by Sasaki, C. T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 20:1069-1077 (6 1999)
© 1999 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Recurrent Carotid Blowout Syndrome: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in a Newly RecognizedSubgroup of Patients

John C. Chaloupka^,a, Toni C. Roth^a, Christopher M. Putman^a, Sanchayeeta Mitra^a, Douglas A. Ross^a, Roger A. Lowlicht^a and Clarence T. Sasaki^a

^a From The Interventional Neuroradiology Service, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.C., T.C.R., C.M.P.), Department of Neurosurgery (J.C.C.), and Section of Otolaryngology (D.A.R., R.A.L., C.T.S.), Department of Surgery Yale University School of Medicine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To our knowledge, recurrent carotid blowout syndrome (rCBS) has not been well described. Our purpose was to review our institution's recent experience with patients who presented with multiple episodes of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS), and who were referred for emergent diagnostic angiography and endovascular therapy.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the last 46 consecutive patients who had a clinical diagnosis of CBS. All patients were examined and treated prospectively according to a standardized protocol. Most patients (43 of 46) had undergone extensive primary and salvage radical surgery with intraoperative brachytherapy or external beam radiation or both. The remaining three patients had either traumatic or iatrogenic CBS.

RESULTS: Twelve patients (26%) in our series had more than one episode of CBS in which a total of 32 (20 recurrent) events were observed (average 2.7, range 2–4). Intervals of rCBS ranged from 1 day to 6 years. Thirteen (65%) of 20 recurrent events were attributed to progressive disease (PD), and seven (35%) of 20 to treatment failures (TFs). In the PD group, seven (54%) of 13 had recurrent ipsilateral disease, and six (46%) of 13 had recurrent contralateral disease. Etiologies of rCBS were as follows: seven exposed carotids; seven carotid pseudoaneurysms; eight small-branch pseudoaneurysms; five tumor hemorrhages; three hyperemic/ulcerated wounds; and one aortic arch rupture. Twenty-seven of 32 events were treated with endovascular therapy, which included the following: nine carotid occlusions; 11 small-branch embolizations; three transarterial tumor embolizations; one carotid stent; and two direct-puncture embolizations. Four of six TFs were retreated successfully with endovascular therapy; the remaining two TFs were managed successfully by surgery. In the PD group, hemorrhagic complications of rCBS were managed successfully in all but one patient, who died. No permanent neurologic or ophthalmologic complications occurred.

CONCLUSION: Recurrent CBS is a frequently encountered problem in which most cases are caused by PD resulting from both multifocal iatrogenic arteriopathy and occasional wound complications that are characteristic of aggressively managed head and neck surgical patients. Initial TFs are encountered often as well. Despite the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of rCBS, most cases can be retreated effectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.W. Pyun, D.H. Lee, H.M. Yoo, J.H. Lee, C.G. Choi, S.J. Kim, and D.C. Suh Placement of Covered Stents for Carotid Blowout in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Follow-up Results after Rescue Treatments AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2007; 28(8): 1594 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Li, S.-W. Hsu, S.-L. Wang, H.-C. Chen, and C.-H. Huang Pseudoaneurysm of the External Carotid Artery Branch following Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 37(4): 310 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-C. Chang, J.-F. Lirng, C.-B. Luo, W.-Y. Guo, M.M.H. Teng, S.-K. Tai, and C.-Y. Chang Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancers: Reconstructive Management by Self-Expandable Stent-Grafts AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 181 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H S Kim, D H Lee, H J Kim, S J Kim, W Kim, S Y Kim, and D C Suh Life-threatening common carotid artery blowout: rescue treatment with a newly designed self-expanding covered nitinol stent. Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 226 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kiyosue, M. Okahara, S. Tanoue, Y. Sagara, S. Matsumoto, H. Mori, M. Arita, T. Watanabe, and M. Suzuki Dispersion of Coils after Parent-Artery Occlusion of Radiation-Induced Internal Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysm AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1080 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Lesley, J. C. Chaloupka, J. B. Weigele, S. Mangla, and M. A. Dogar Preliminary Experience with Endovascular Reconstruction for the Management of Carotid Blowout Syndrome AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 975 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]