AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pruvo, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pruvo, J. P.

ARTICLE

Preliminary Experience Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography to Assess Vertebral Artery Structure for the Follow-up of Suspected Dissection

Xavier Leclerc,a, Christian Lucasa, Olivier Godefroya, Lionel Nicola, Aline Morettia, Didier Leysa and Jean Pierre Pruvoa

a From the Departments of Neuroradiology (X.L., A.M., J.P.P.) and Neurology (C.L., O.G., D.L.), Hôpital Salengro, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, and the Medical Division (L.N.), Siemens, Saint-Denis, France.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Important advances have been made recently in MR angiography with the use of contrast medium injection, which has proved valuable for the imaging of vertebral arteries (VAs) obtained during short scanning times. Our purpose was to assess the feasability of contrast-enhanced fast 3D MR angiography for imaging VAs and to evaluate the long-term follow-up of VA dissections.

METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients with 18 angiographically documented VA dissections (seven occlusive dissections and 11 stenotic dissections, including two each with a pseudoaneurysm) were followed up using both contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and cervical T1-weighted MR imaging at a median delay of 22 months. Ten patients underwent MR imaging at the acute phase as well, and nine underwent early follow-up angiography at a median delay of 3 months. MR angiographic findings were determined by consensus, focussing on image quality, presence of residual stenosis, luminal irregularities, and occlusion.

RESULTS: Of the 32 VAs, a segment of the artery was not assessable on contrast-enhanced MR angiography in each of four small VAs. A central signal void artifact of cervical arteries was seen in one patient and motion artifacts were seen in two, but images could be interpreted. A venous enhancement was detected in 10 of 16 examinations, but this did not prevent image analysis. Ten of 11 stenotic dissections returned to normal, whereas one stenotic dissection progressed to occlusion. Two pseudoaneurysms detected by initial angiography resolved spontaneously; one was revealed only by delayed MR angiography, and one was detected on an early MR angiogram and proved resolved on a late MR angiogram. Of the seven initially occluded VAs, five reopened, with a hairline residual lumen in each of three.

CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience showed that contrast-enhanced MR angiography is a promising tool for imaging VAs; it allows the assessment of VA dissection changes over time. Most lesions tended to heal spontaneously, but persisting occlusion or pseudoaneurysm could be detected during the late course.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. H. Rodallec, V. Marteau, S. Gerber, L. Desmottes, and M. Zins
Craniocervical Arterial Dissection: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2008; 28(6): 1711 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. H. Lee, R. D. Brown Jr, J. N. Mandrekar, and B. Mokri
Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study
Neurology, November 28, 2006; 67(10): 1809 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
M. F. Rafay, D. Armstrong, G. deVeber, T. Domi, A. Chan, and D. L. MacGregor
Craniocervical Arterial Dissection in Children: Clinical and Radiographic Presentation and Outcome
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 8 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Tola, M. Yurdakul, and T. Cumhur
B-Flow Imaging in Low Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2005; 24(11): 1497 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. W. Yang, J. C. Carr, S. F. Futterer, M. D. Morasch, B. P. Yang, S. M. Shors, and J. P. Finn
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2095 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto
Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. Ohkuma, S. Suzuki, T. Kikkawa, and N. Shimamura
Neuroradiologic and Clinical Features of Arterial Dissection of the Anterior Cerebral Artery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2003; 24(4): 691 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Remonda, P. Senn, A. Barth, M. Arnold, K.-O. Lovblad, and G. Schroth
Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 213 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. I. Schievink
Spontaneous Dissection of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries
N. Engl. J. Med., March 22, 2001; 344(12): 898 - 906.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Contrast-Enhanced MRA: An Effective Imaging Tool for VA Dissection?
Journal Watch Neurology, January 1, 2000; 2000(101): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]