AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saeki, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaura, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saeki, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaura, A.

BRAIN

Correlation of High Signal Intensity of the Pituitary Stalk in Macroadenoma and Postoperative Diabetes Insipidus

Naokatsu Saekia, Seiichiro Hoshic, Souichi Sunadac, Kenro Sunamic, Hisayuki Muraia, Motoo Kubotaa, Ichiro Tatsunob, Toshihiko Iuchid and Akira Yamauraa

a Department of Neurosurgery Chiba University School of Medicine Japan
b the Second Department of Internal Medicine Chiba University School of Medicine Japan
c Chiba University School of Medicine; the Division of Neurosurgery Kawatetsu, Chiba Hospital
d the Division of Neurosurgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Japan

Address reprint requests to Naokatsu Saeki, Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba 260-8670, Japan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High signal intensity (HSI) at the pituitary stalk is reported in pituitary adenomas. Our purpose was to clarify how and when this HSI formed, its long-term fate, and its relation to the function of infundibuloneurohypophyseal (INH) system.

METHODS: Twenty-two patients with pituitary adenoma and supradiaphragmatic extension underwent 1.5-T MR imaging. Patients were assigned to two groups A (n = 18; those with stalk tip HSI) and B (n = 4; those without HSI) on postoperative T1-weighted images. Endocrine status was postoperatively evaluated and compared in both groups.

RESULTS: Group A patients did not have postoperative permanent diabetes insipidus (DI). Preoperative images in 17 patients revealed linear or ovoid HSI on the adenoma surface immediately above the diaphragma sellae. Of these, two with a poorly developed diaphragma sellae had HSI near the median eminence and inside the sella turcica. HSI was not apparent in the remaining patient with a giant, irregularly shaped adenoma. In group B, three patients had permanent DI. No patient had HSI on preoperative images.

CONCLUSION: Postoperative pituitary stalk HSI is derived from preoperative supradiaphragmatic HSI on the adenoma surface. The suspected mechanism is blockage of the hypophyseal-pituitary axis, with an accumulation of neurosecretory granules at the diaphragmatic level. Diaphragmatic shape may influence the location of HSI. The shape and location of HSI are essentially stable for years after surgery. No patients with permanent DI had HSI before or after surgery. HIS at the pituitary stalk tip is a useful landmark for predicting functional integrity of the INH system in patients with a large pituitary adenoma.