AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ceballos, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ceballos, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, R. K., II

Case Report
HEAD AND NECK

Plain Film Imaging of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants

Elizenda M. Ceballosa and Richard K. Parrish, IIa

a From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL

Address reprint requests to Richard K. Parrish II, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136

Summary: A glaucoma drainage implant was detected on plain skull radiographs before MR imaging examination of the brain. The patient was denied the MR imaging for fear of dislodging the "metallic foreign body." The Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant was mistakenly identified as an orbital metallic object based on its radiographic characteristics. Because none of the current glaucoma drainage implants contain ferromagnetic material, patients with these devices can undergo MR imaging without special precaution.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. G. Shellock and A. Spinazzi
MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1140 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]