AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published June 19, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;29:1649.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1143v1
29/9/1649    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirsattari, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D.H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirsattari, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D.H.

BRAIN

MR Imaging–Compatible Electroencephalography Electrode System for an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit

S.M. Mirsattari, L.M. Tapsell, J.R. Ives and D.H. Lee

From the Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences (S.M.M., J.R.I.), Medical Biophysics (S.M.M.), and Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.M.M., D.H.L.), The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre (S.M.M., J.R.I. D.H.L.), London, Ontario, Canada; and Epilepsy Clinic (L.M.T.), Mayo Clinic Hospital, Scottsdale, Ariz.

Please address correspondence to Seyed M. Mirsattari, MD, PhD, FRCP (C), B10-108, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Rd, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5 Canada; e-mail: smirsat2{at}uwo.ca

SUMMARY: We studied the usefulness of an MR imaging–compatible electroencephalography (EEG) electrode system for continuous EEG recordings in our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) by comparing 100 consecutive patients with MR imaging–compatible and MR imaging–incompatible EEG recording electrodes who underwent MR imaging between 3:00 PM and 7:00 AM. The MR imaging–compatible system captured seizures in 21/50 (42%) patients and clinically valuable new electrographic data in 13/50 (26%) patients during the study interval, whereas possible seizures were lost to recording in 19/50 (38%) patients in the MR imaging–incompatible system. EEG recording was comparable by both systems, but the nurses could disconnect and reconnect the patients to their electrode cables only in the MR imaging–compatible system during the study interval while the EEG technologists were off duty. This study shows that the MR imaging–compatible system could be used routinely for long-term monitoring of the patients in EMUs.