AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published October 15, 2009
This Article
Free to Access This article has been Unlocked
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Underhill, H.R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatsukami, T.S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Underhill, H.R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatsukami, T.S.

INTERVENTIONAL

Predictors of Surface Disruption with MR Imaging in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

H.R. Underhill, C. Yuan, V.L. Yarnykh, B. Chu, M. Oikawa, L. Dong, N.L. Polissar, G.A. Garden, S.C. Cramer and T.S. Hatsukami

From the Departments of Radiology (H.R.U., C.Y., V.L.Y., B.C., M.O., L.D.), Neurology (G.A.G.), and Surgery (T.S.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Mountain-Whisper-Light Statistical Consulting (N.L.P.), Seattle, Washington; and Department of Neurology (S.C.C.), University of California, Irvine, California.

Please address correspondence to Thomas S. Hatsukami, MD, Vascular Imaging Lab, University of Washington, 815 Mercer St, Box 358050, Seattle, WA 98109; e-mail: tomhat{at}u.washington.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surface disruption, either ulceration or fibrous cap rupture, has been identified as a key feature of the unstable atherosclerotic plaque. In this prospective observational study, we sought to determine the characteristics of the carotid lesion that predict the development of new surface disruption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eight asymptomatic individuals with 50%–79% carotid stenosis underwent carotid MR imaging at baseline and at 3 years. Multicontrast imaging criteria were used to determine the presence or absence of calcification, LRNC, intraplaque hemorrhage, and surface disruption. Volume measurements of plaque morphology and the LRNC and calcification, when present, were collected.

RESULTS: At baseline, 21.3% (23/108) of participants were identified with a surface disruption. After 3 years, 9 (10.6%) of the remaining 85 individuals without disruption at baseline developed a new surface disruption during follow-up. Among all baseline variables associated with new surface disruption during regression analysis, the proportion of wall volume occupied by the LRNC (percentage LRNC volume; OR per 5% increase, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5–4.6) was the strongest classifier (AUC = 0.95) during ROC analysis. New surface disruption was associated with a significant increase in percentage LRNC volume (1.7 ± 2.0% per year, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS: This prospective investigation of asymptomatic individuals with 50%–79% stenosis provides compelling evidence that LRNC size may govern the risk of future surface disruption. Identification of carotid plaques in danger of developing new surface disruption may prove clinically valuable for preventing the transition from stable to unstable atherosclerotic disease.

Abbreviations: TOF, time-of-flight